CO129-321 - Public Offices & Others - 1903 — Page 485

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Any further communication on this subject should be addressed to-

The Under Secretary of State,

War Office,

"Works."

London, S.W.,

and the following number quoted.

Hong Kong 3/162. (I.G.F.1.)

Sir,

C.O.

46336

479!

War Office,

28 DEC 03

London, S.W.

28 December, 1903.

With reference to your letter of the 7th August last (25263/1903), relative to the transfer of Colonial Military land at Hong Kong from this Department to the Admiralty in connection with the defence of that Station, I am directed by the Secretary of State for War to acquaint you for the information of the Secretary of State for the Colonies that the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty have communicated to this Office a copy of a letter dated 18th August 1903, (D.F.10440/7013) which they have caused to be addressed to you in reply to the letter sent to them from your Office on the 7th idem.

2. Mr. Arnold-Forster agrees with their Lordships' view that it is not possible to separate Naval from Military defence, and it appears to him that so long as Colonial Military land is required for defence purposes it is immaterial which Department occupies the land for such purposes.

It is further to be recollected that certain Military reserves were transferred to the then Board of Ordnance which represented both services and not the

Under Secretary of State,

Army

Colonial Office.

Edit History

2026-06-01 13:48:45 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Any further communication on this subject should be addressed to- The Under Secretary of State, War Office, "Works." London, S.W., and the following number quoted. Hong Kong 3/162. (I.G.F.1.) Sir, C.O. 46336 479! War Office, 28 DEC 03 London, S.W. 28 December, 1903. With reference to your letter of the 7th August last (25263/1903), relative to the transfer of Colonial Military land at Hong Kong from this Department to the Admiralty in connection with the defence of that Station, I am directed by the Secretary of State for War to acquaint you for the information of the Secretary of State for the Colonies that the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty have communicated to this Office a copy of a letter dated 18th August 1903, (D.F.10440/7013) which they have caused to be addressed to you in reply to the letter sent to them from your Office on the 7th idem. 2. Mr. Arnold-Forster agrees with their Lordships' view that it is not possible to separate Naval from Military defence, and it appears to him that so long as Colonial Military land is required for defence purposes it is immaterial which Department occupies the land for such purposes. It is further to be recollected that certain Military reserves were transferred to the then Board of Ordnance which represented both services and not the Under Secretary of State, Army Colonial Office.
Baseline (Original)
: Any further communication on this subject should be addressed to- The Under Secretary of State, War Office, "Works." London, S.W., and the following number quoted. Hong Kong 3/162. (I.G.F.l.) Sir, Apy C.O. 46336 479 ! War Office, 28 DEC 03 London, S.W. 28 December, 1903. do Ramy здоров With reference to your letter of the 7th Admy August last (25263/1903), relative to the transfer of Colonial Military land at Hong Kong from this Department to the Admiralty in connection with the defence of that Station, I am directed by the Secretary of State for War to acquaint you for the information of the Secretary of State for the Colonies that the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty have communicated to this Office a copy of a letter dated 18th August 1903, (D.F.10440/7013) which they have caused to be addressed to you in reply to the letter sent to them from your Office on the 7th idem. 2. Mr. Arnold-Forster agrees with their Lordships' view that it is not possible to separate Naval from Militar: defence, and it appears to him that so long as Colonial Military land is required for defence purposes it is immaterial which Department occupies the land for such purposes. It is further to be recollected that certain Military reserves were transferred to the then Board of Ordnance which represented both services and not the Under Secretary of State, Army Colonial Office.
2026-06-01 13:48:45 · Baseline
View content

:

Any further communication on this subject should be addressed to-

The Under Secretary of State,

War Office,

"Works."

London, S.W.,

and the following number quoted.

Hong Kong 3/162. (I.G.F.l.)

Sir,

Apy

C.O.

46336

479 !

War Office,

28 DEC 03

London, S.W.

28

December, 1903.

do

Ramy здоров

With reference to your letter of the 7th

Admy August last (25263/1903), relative to the transfer of

Colonial Military land at Hong Kong from this Department

to the Admiralty in connection with the defence of that

Station, I am directed by the Secretary of State for War

to acquaint you for the information of the Secretary of

State for the Colonies that the Lords Commissioners of

the Admiralty have communicated to this Office a copy of

a letter dated 18th August 1903, (D.F.10440/7013) which

they have caused to be addressed to you in reply to the

letter sent to them from your Office on the 7th idem.

2. Mr. Arnold-Forster agrees with their Lordships'

view that it is not possible to separate Naval from Militar:

defence, and it appears to him that so long as Colonial

Military land is required for defence purposes it is

immaterial which Department occupies the land for such

purposes.

It is further to be recollected that certain

Military reserves were transferred to the then Board of

Ordnance which represented both services and not the

Under Secretary of State,

Army

Colonial Office.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.